Blog Layout

May 17, 2023

Budget Airlines

Are they worth the low cost?

Budget airlines, or Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs), have become a popular option for those seeking low-cost flights around certain countries or regions. Consumers are drawn to this low-cost model of travel as they want a quick and efficient way to get to their destination and are willing to give up certain travel ‘luxuries’ to save money. One of Europe’s most popular LCCs, Ryanair, charged an average of $40 per ticket, making it an extremely affordable way to travel. Compared to regular carriers, Ryanair saw revenue of $1 billion in 2019, whereas American Airlines made $2.1 billion



LCCs are primarily popular in Europe and South-East Asia, with a recent rising in the Americas. The best budget airlines are in Europe, such as Ryanair (Ireland), EasyJet (Ireland), and Pegasus Airlines (Turkey). Other successful airlines include GOL (Brazil), Southwest Airlines (USA), and Flair Airlines, Swoop Airlines, or Porter Airlines (Canada). Though not listed here, there are dozens of more LCCs operating all over the world. 


Since the rise of LCCs, the industry competition has only grown, with LCCs capturing a large portion of occupied seats (known as ‘pax’). In Europe alone, 40 percent of pax come from LCCs. Latin America and North America also have high figures, at 36 percent and 32 percent, respectively. Globally, 32 percent of pax come from LCCs. These carriers have captured a significant portion of consumers and are continuing to spread to larger airports, attracting even more popularity. 


Advantages of Budget Airlines 

Ticket Prices & Operational Costs 

Ticket prices are the most competitive factor for airlines and with the introduction of LCCs, the competition is only getting stronger. To keep costs low, LCCs exclude several in-flight services and amenities, don’t include free baggage, or seat selection, and select secondary airports that have lower costs. Overall, a flight between New York’s LaGuardia Airport and LAX would cost around $231 on Southwest, whereas on United the price is anywhere from $400-$900. 


Operational costs can be extremely high, considering many airlines have hundreds or thousands of flights. For standard carriers, a 7-hour flight across the Atlantic would cost $72,000, whereas a 2.5-hour LCC flight through Europe would be $12,000. LCCs variable operational cost is around $4,000-$4,700/hour whereas larger aircrafts (>300 seats), cost between $9,000-$10,300/hour. These savings can be passed on to customers in the form of lower ticket prices.


Customizable Travel Experience 

The overarching idea of low-cost carriers is that they are a cheaper means of travel. These airlines cut ticket prices down to bare-bones and include only what’s necessary to get you from point A to point B. By excluding services, like one checked bag and free in-flight refreshments, consumers can travel without paying for unnecessary features that don’t require. On typical flights, travellers who don’t check a bag or take advantage of other complimentary services don’t receive any sort of rebate; they simply pay the full price of the ticket. 


With LCCs, on the other hand, you pay for exactly what you get. For some, a plane ticket and a personal item are all they require. Even if you require additional services, you can choose exactly what you need and don’t pay for anything more. LCCs are the most cost-effective way to travel, especially when travelling to multiple countries or going away for the weekend. 


Fleet Uniformity 

LCCs benefit from fleet uniformity. Having common planes makes it easier for maintenance engineers to service aircraft, and training staff on only a few types of planes is also more streamlined. Likewise, the ability to maintain inventory and aircraft availability is improved. Traditional carriers require several sizes of planes for flight size variation, whereas LCC passenger demand doesn’t vary. LCCs typically fly Boeing 737s, which means they can carry around 170 passengers per flight.


Consistent routes that are similar in length let airlines can be more operationally viable. This business model doesn’t work with flights that are variable in length or frequency. Fleet uniformity is extremely cost-effective, and with most LCCs, commonality in their fleets only benefits and sustains their revenue. 

However, fleet uniformity comes with a significant flaw. For example, in 2019 Boeing grounded their 737 MAX aircraft, which resulted in Southwest Airlines grounding 34 planes. By solely relying on a single fleet style, any maintenance or other problems could result in a string of flight disruptions. 


Disadvantages of Budget Airlines 

Comfort & Customer Service 

Some comfort and amenities on flights have become standard and are usually included in ticket prices. However, the main strategy to lower prices for LCCs is excluding many ‘complementary’ services such as included checked baggage, in-flight entertainment, and free seat selection. Unlike regular airlines, these carriers don’t have TVs or Wi-Fi onboard, so personal entertainment is up to the traveller. They also don’t offer free in-flight refreshments, typically only water, while some airlines may offer food for an additional fee.


Consumers may also face issues if they miss their flight or require a refund. Typically, these companies don’t offer refunds for missed flights, and processing a refund may be time-consuming and difficult. Many LCCs have also stranded passengers around the world due to cancelled flights and insufficient passenger volumes leading to a lack of funds. In cases where flights were cancelled, getting new tickets was increasingly difficult due to high demand. Some customers have also experienced ‘customer service nightmares’, with one example of EasyJet closing check-in with 30 percent of passengers still waiting in line. 


Ancillary Fees 

On top of the decreased included amenities, many services have high hidden fees that, in some cases, are required. Most travellers take carry-ons or checked bags, which can range from $32 to $53. There are also strict baggage weights and dimensions, and many carriers don’t allow for overweight baggage, as well as fees for seat selection which can make it difficult for groups to sit together. Travellers can end up paying anywhere from $4 to $40 to choose their seats


Many airlines will also charge passengers for checking in to their flight at the airport. While online check-in is free, checking in at the airport will cost you $58 with Ryanair. In addition, if passengers needed to cancel or change their flight, they are met with high cancellation fees that may be more than their flight ticket. On Ryanair, for example, passengers cannot cancel their flight and receive any money back, and changing their flight can range from $37-$101. Even changing your name on a ticket can cost passengers up to $170 24 hours after booking. 


Most shockingly, LCCs don’t make money on the ticket price. If tickets were the only stream of revenue for Ryanair, they would have lost $1.5 billion in 2019. Almost 30 percent of revenue comes from hidden fees or added costs, like baggage and in-flight food. Other airlines, like Wizzair, saw 45 percent of revenue coming from ancillary revenue. 


Route Availability 

The greatest disadvantage of LCCs is their region and route availability. Some LCCs only service popular areas. For example, Southwest Airlines offers dozens of routes throughout more populated areas, but they don’t stop in Northern states such as North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, and Maine. In some states, they only serve one city.


Since these carriers use some secondary airports to reduce fees, this could mean landing way further from your destination than intended. An example of this is Ryanair’s flight to Frankfurt, Germany, which lands travellers in Hahn, 75 miles away from their destination. You may also land in an entirely different country. If travelling to Copenhagen, Denmark, you may land in Malmö, Sweden, which is 25 miles away. LCCs save money this way, but it can create a big headache for travellers who are left to figure out how to reach their destination. 


Are Budget Airlines Commercially Viable?

LCCs make travelling by air more cost-effective and efficient. Providing consumers with the option to ditch excessive ‘luxury’ services and allowing them to pay only for what they want makes it increasingly easier to travel. Though the sacrifice of comfort, effective customer service, and route availability may pose a disadvantage to its viability, consumers actively decide to spend less and receive less in terms of amenities. With the significant amount of market capture and revenue from LCCs, it’s clear that this business model can play a role in the larger airline industry.

23 Dec, 2023
Context A CBC News article discussed the possibility of the Canadian economy heading into a recession, or whether the country has already passed that threshold. The article discussed this possibility based on slowed growth, high inflation, and the Bank of Canada’s continued interest rate hikes. Analysis A recession is a significant reduction in economic activity that occurs over a length of time, usually months or years. One of the most accepted definitions of a recession comes from the economist Julius Shiskin in 1974, who identified the threshold to an economic recession as two consecutive quarters of declining GDP, although economists often argue about the comprehensiveness of this measure. The causes of a recession can be quite complicated and have many contributing factors. Some common examples include a sudden economic shock such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, excessive debt, asset bubbles, inflation, deflation, or large technological changes. One major factor influencing the probability of an economic recession includes rising interest rates from the Bank of Canada, which has implemented the highest hike in the shortest amount of time in all of the bank’s history, raising the rate over eight times since 2022. The Bank of Canada increased interest rates in order to curb inflation since rising interest rates discourage taking on debt and spending. This further encourages companies to lower prices or slow inflation to increase demand. Currently, the Bank of Canada is keeping at the 5.0 percent rate but has said that further hikes are not off the table as inflation may continue to exceed acceptable rates. Increases in interest rates can certainly contribute to or precede a recession. In fact, the Bank of Canada has raised interest rates three times to slow inflation since the 1960s and all three times this action led to an economic recession. Current fears of a looming economic depression are also not unique to Canada, as following the COVID-19 pandemic, the global inflation rate increased to 8.73 percent in 2021. This was due to supply chain issues, as well as the effect of the Russia-Ukraine War creating rising food and energy prices, as well as general fiscal instability. A majority of the World Economic Forum’s lead economists agreed earlier this year that we could see the beginning of a global recession starting in 2023, which would certainly affect the Canadian economy. The article also discusses the Canadian economy’s slowed economic growth, as the GDP has stagnated in the second quarter of this year. However, it suggests other factors may explain the decrease, including striking port workers in British Columbia, and the resulting negative effect on economic activity. An RBC report mentions how on a per-person GDP basis, there has already been a decline for four straight quarters despite a surge in population growth, and concludes overall predictions for GDP growth do not look promising despite local factors including Canadian wildfires and strikes. They also point to a 0.5 percent increase in the unemployment rate over the past few months, which has historically tended to indicate a looming recession.
21 Dec, 2023
Context The City of Ottawa Mayor, Mark Sutcliff released a statement about a revised plan for the redevelopment of Lansdowne, an urban public park containing historic landmarks and commercial venues. The project includes the demolition of a sports arena complex, stadium stands, and the building of a new event center, residential units, and retail space. Despite suggesting the new plan has addressed the concerns of residents, many issues remain. Analysis The City of Ottawa and the Ottawa Sports and Entertainment Group (OSEG) have been in partnership to develop Lansdowne since 2012 and finished an original redevelopment of the park back in 2014. A few years later in 2019, the financial sustainability of the park came to the city council’s attention, and in 2020 the partnership was extended another 10 years with direction to develop a new plan to revitalize Lansdowne. Consultation with community members started in 2020, with the original concept released last year in 2022, and a revised version released this month. Community feedback was acquired through various platforms including public information sessions, an open email for feedback, and public surveys. A summary report of that feedback was published on October 6th, which highlighted the six most common themes of community residents’ concerns. The first concern was related to the size and number of the multiple high-rise apartments which were designed to exceed 30 floors. In the new plan , they have removed one of the three planned buildings, with fewer total units in each, and only one tower with the potential to be built at 40 stories. Residents were also concerned about the loss of greenspace due to the new event center construction. Many people suggested they wanted that greenspace allocated elsewhere, or alternatively, an accessible greenspace roof on the event center. Although in the original plan the city had conceptualized a greenspace rooftop on the event center, this was scrapped in the new plan as it was deemed too expensive to maintain. Respondents wanted a restriction of vehicles to the premises to promote pedestrian safety, a concern that has existed since Lansdowne was first renovated back in 2014. They also wanted more public transportation infrastructure to and from the park, whether that is the local city buses, trains, or cycling infrastructure to reduce congestion on connecting roads. Relatedly, residents also desired more accessible public use space from washrooms to water fountains to usable and free space for people to occupy. The new plan has reduced the number of parking spaces for the residential buildings to meet the Bylaw limit of 0.4 spaces per unit, down from 739 to 336 spaces, while they added 36 new spaces for the event center. In terms of accessible public space, the new plan includes 27,000 square feet of space originally earmarked for the third residential building, now available for an unspecified “public realm.” Residents also wanted more local and less corporate or big-box businesses, to reflect the unique local community better. The new plan does suggest the amount of retail space has been reduced from 108,000 square feet to 49,000 square feet but does not directly address the desire to attract smaller, local businesses. Finally, there was also a concern about financial transparency of how the project is being funded and the resulting impact on the City. The Federation of Citizens Association (FCA) which represents over 70 community groups voted unanimously to oppose the new plan, which comes with a very costly price tag of $419 million, increased from $332 million of the first plan. They cite that the debt comes at a time when the transit system is facing major issues, and the city is struggling with a housing affordability crisis.
20 Dec, 2023
Context Newly elected Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith has defended her cabinet which is coming under fire over conflict-of-interest concerns. Environment and Protected Areas Minister Rebecca Schulz’s husband, Cole Schulz , may be lobbying the government in the areas that the Minister works in. Cole Schulz's firm is working on removing the protection of a threatened caribou range to make room for the oil and gas industry – which has raised concerns over who has Minister Schulz’s ear. Analysis The company that Cole Schulz is a partner with, Garrison Strategies, was hired by the Explorers and Producers Association of Canada and is working to influence the government on the issuing of reclamation certificates for oil and gas sites. The lobbyists are working to gain more access to protected caribou habitats to expand the oil and gas industry. They are hoping to “ address the moratorium on tenure in caribou regions ” which would effectively give them better access to land and investments. The Little Smoky and A La Peche herds in northwest Alberta were protected by a moratorium in 2013 which stopped the granting of new energy leases in this area. At the time, 95 percent of the herd’s range was heavily damaged. Phillip Meintzer of the Alberta Wilderness Association found that though records show that Garrison didn’t contact Environment and Protected Areas directly, the firm’s causes are “ too close for comfort ”. Meintzer also notes that as Garrison works on opening the protected caribou land for Alberta Energy, Environment and Protected Areas should be working on a protection plan for the federally and provincially designated threatened animal . Minister Schulz is working closely with the ethics commissioner, however, Danielle Smith confirmed that “ the ethics commissioner has looked at it, given guidance and there’s no violation [of the Conflicts of Interest Act]”. Cole Schulz also indicated that his firm wasn’t aware that Minister Schulz breached the Act at any time. Meintzer suggests that this situation “ calls for a further look ” from a third party. Sources https://globalnews.ca/news/9988998/alberta-premier-danielle-smith-rebecca-schulz/
Share by: