Blog Layout

May 11, 2023

Does Plastic Recycling Work?

The Benefits and Limitations of Recycling

Plastic is a miracle material. Since it was introduced nearly seven decades ago during the third industrial revolution, plastic has become ubiquitous. The challenge today is to clean up the waste from the era of throwaway culture and advance toward a more sustainable circular plastics economy.



Recycling offers the potential for sustainable plastic usage without the adverse effects of pollution. But recycling, on its own, is not enough to overcome the vast amount of plastic waste that has been created.

This article, the second in a series looking at plastic and plastic pollution, will examine both the positives and negatives which must be carefully weighed to assess how best to approach plastic recycling.


Pros of Recycling 

Reduction of Plastic Waste in the Environment

Today, an estimated 300 million tonnes of plastic end up in the waste stream annually. To put this in perspective, the entire weight of all 7.75 billion people alive is approximately 321.9 million tonnes. Humanity creates its own weight in plastic every year.

 

It’s estimated that there will be 12 billion tonnes of plastics littering the aquatic and terrestrial environment by 2050 if we persist at the current rate of plastic pollution without recycling. Plastics in the ocean choke marine life, threaten food security, and lead to increased flooding due to clogged drainage systems. Animals and livestock on land can also mistake plastic for food resulting in serious health consequences. Added to these threats are the known and unknown long-term impacts of microplastics, including abrasion on the digestive systems of organisms that eat them and the fatal accumulation of these microplastics in their systems. Plastic recycling can reduce this impact by preventing plastic waste from ending up in the environment in the first place.


Value Recovery and Creation

There is value in used plastics, and if this value is fully harnessed there could be an abundance of materials for manufacturing new products. We currently only recycle about 9 percent of the plastics we produce. This seems like a tragic underutilization of resources, especially when you consider the types of products and the amount of energy that can be recovered.


Recycling offers the possibility of an effective post-consumer plastics economy. Advancement in recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) means PET bottles can now be recycled back into the same food-grade PET bottles with little or no loss in value. Promising results have also been seen in the pilot-scale study for food-grade recycled polypropylene.


Recycling also creates value in the form of jobs, income, and revenue. For example, the UNFCCC reports how plastic waste collection has empowered women in Ghana. Across the world, various companies of all sizes have been formed around recycling, all of which potentially create jobs and income for more people.


China had been importing waste plastics from other countries for recycling since the 1990s and was among those countries that recognized the value of plastic waste and could harness at least a portion of it. However, in 2017, it began to ban imports as managing domestic waste became more challenging and as data revealed that over 70 percent of the imported waste was eventually discarded.


Augments Other Plastic Waste Management Strategies 

On its own, recycling won’t solve the global plastic pollution challenge. It will require multiple approaches and efforts from all stakeholders to move toward a more sustainable and fully circular plastic economy. The World Economic Forum presents a roadmap for integrating multiple measures, including imposing bans on plastics, designing more sustainable products, and developing more effective alternatives.


The elimination of unnecessary plastic use reduces the volume of plastic that can end up as waste. This reduces pressure on recycling infrastructure so that recyclable plastics can remain in the cycle for as long as possible.


Cons of Recycling 

Requires Energy and Releases Carbon Emissions 

Energy is consumed at all stages of the recycling process. Even before it gets to the recycling facility, energy is consumed to collect, source, and transport the materials to the factory. Automated sorting requires machinery and labor resources, and plastics must be cleaned, shredded, and broken down into smaller particles.


Heat and mechanical shearing then melt and reform the plastic into smaller pellets that can be sold to plastic manufacturers or processed in-house. More energy is then required to form these pellets into new products.


In 2015, the combined emission from landfilling, recycling, and incineration was estimated to be 1.8 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide. Plastics are on course to contribute 17 percent of global emissions by 2050.


Some of this can be addressed through renewable energy sources. Some studies have also explored the possibility of powering mechanical plastic recycling with energy sourced from the chemical recycling of plastic, but at the current level of technology, this has been prohibitive for large-scale commercial applications. Powering recycling with 100% renewable energy can bring down the emission by 51 percent.


Not All Plastics Can Be Safely and Efficiently Recycled

There are many different types of plastics, each with its own properties and attributes. The resin identification number 1 to 6, which are indicated in between the chasing arrows recycle sign, are assigned to the most common ones which are most polluting. These are PET (polyethylene terephthalate), HDPE (high-density polyethylene), PVC (polyvinyl chloride), LDPE (low-density polyethylene), PP (polypropylene), and PS (polystyrene).


The number 7 refers to all other plastics such as nylons, ABS, polycarbonates, and many more. Plastic shopping bags for example are mostly made using LDPE, plastic drink bottles are usually made using PET, and takeaway bowls are made from PP. Not all these types of plastic are equally well suited to recycling.


Mechanical recycling of plastics can degrade it to the point that many plastics lose their physical properties after it’s recycled the first time. Virgin plastics must often be added to recycled plastics to retain some of these properties.


Additionally, stains, glues, labels, printed inks, and other impurities all contribute to less efficient recycling. A green plastic bottle is more difficult to recycle than a clear one, for example. Recent technologies have been introduced to remove ink from plastic packaging. However, this has yet to be scaled up for commercial use.


Further, plastics such as polystyrene and PVC can release toxic compounds during recycling which can result in serious health hazards. Manufacturers must therefore consider the end of life of the product or packaging during the design and production stages.


Collecting and Sorting Plastic for Recycling 

Although often overlooked as technically uncomplicated, the process of collecting and sorting plastic poses a major challenge to large-scale recycling.


Once a piece of plastic is out in the environment it is very difficult to get back. It could be washed up on a beach, drifting across an ocean, clogging drainage infrastructure, inside the bellies of whales, or blown around a city street.


As the pressure increases on companies to use more recycled plastic, the surge in demand has increased the price. Recent reports show that the price for rPET has risen to $1 per pound compared to the fraction of a dollar that virgin PET costs. This emerging scarcity is not due to the lack of used PET, there’s plenty in the ocean or landfills, but instead due to the resource input that is required to collect and sort them to get them to food-grade quality.


Redefining the Age of Plastics 

Plastic is not inherently harmful to the environment. It is the misuse and mismanagement of plastic that poses the biggest risk. On the flip side, if we could optimally harness the benefits of what was, and still is, a miracle material, we can redefine the age of plastics as one of abundance, sustainability, and endless possibilities.


The ideal plastic cycle is one where the material is produced sustainably, used repeatedly, and, at the end of life, converted back into raw materials to repeat the cycle perpetually.

Whether or not this is possible depends on the technology available. Optimal utilization of the tools of the fourth industrial revolution can greatly assist in creating a more circular plastic economy. Tools such as near-infrared spectroscopy can assist automated sorting and improve the purity of recycled materials.


UNEP estimates that the cost of cleaning up plastic pollution in the future far exceeds what it would cost to implement strategies to stop plastics from littering the environment today. Considering the advantages and disadvantages, at the very least, plastic recycling becomes necessary to keep the plastic in the supply loop for as long as possible.


You may be interested in: Banning Single-Use Plastics – What are the Pros and Cons?

23 Dec, 2023
Context A CBC News article discussed the possibility of the Canadian economy heading into a recession, or whether the country has already passed that threshold. The article discussed this possibility based on slowed growth, high inflation, and the Bank of Canada’s continued interest rate hikes. Analysis A recession is a significant reduction in economic activity that occurs over a length of time, usually months or years. One of the most accepted definitions of a recession comes from the economist Julius Shiskin in 1974, who identified the threshold to an economic recession as two consecutive quarters of declining GDP, although economists often argue about the comprehensiveness of this measure. The causes of a recession can be quite complicated and have many contributing factors. Some common examples include a sudden economic shock such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, excessive debt, asset bubbles, inflation, deflation, or large technological changes. One major factor influencing the probability of an economic recession includes rising interest rates from the Bank of Canada, which has implemented the highest hike in the shortest amount of time in all of the bank’s history, raising the rate over eight times since 2022. The Bank of Canada increased interest rates in order to curb inflation since rising interest rates discourage taking on debt and spending. This further encourages companies to lower prices or slow inflation to increase demand. Currently, the Bank of Canada is keeping at the 5.0 percent rate but has said that further hikes are not off the table as inflation may continue to exceed acceptable rates. Increases in interest rates can certainly contribute to or precede a recession. In fact, the Bank of Canada has raised interest rates three times to slow inflation since the 1960s and all three times this action led to an economic recession. Current fears of a looming economic depression are also not unique to Canada, as following the COVID-19 pandemic, the global inflation rate increased to 8.73 percent in 2021. This was due to supply chain issues, as well as the effect of the Russia-Ukraine War creating rising food and energy prices, as well as general fiscal instability. A majority of the World Economic Forum’s lead economists agreed earlier this year that we could see the beginning of a global recession starting in 2023, which would certainly affect the Canadian economy. The article also discusses the Canadian economy’s slowed economic growth, as the GDP has stagnated in the second quarter of this year. However, it suggests other factors may explain the decrease, including striking port workers in British Columbia, and the resulting negative effect on economic activity. An RBC report mentions how on a per-person GDP basis, there has already been a decline for four straight quarters despite a surge in population growth, and concludes overall predictions for GDP growth do not look promising despite local factors including Canadian wildfires and strikes. They also point to a 0.5 percent increase in the unemployment rate over the past few months, which has historically tended to indicate a looming recession.
21 Dec, 2023
Context The City of Ottawa Mayor, Mark Sutcliff released a statement about a revised plan for the redevelopment of Lansdowne, an urban public park containing historic landmarks and commercial venues. The project includes the demolition of a sports arena complex, stadium stands, and the building of a new event center, residential units, and retail space. Despite suggesting the new plan has addressed the concerns of residents, many issues remain. Analysis The City of Ottawa and the Ottawa Sports and Entertainment Group (OSEG) have been in partnership to develop Lansdowne since 2012 and finished an original redevelopment of the park back in 2014. A few years later in 2019, the financial sustainability of the park came to the city council’s attention, and in 2020 the partnership was extended another 10 years with direction to develop a new plan to revitalize Lansdowne. Consultation with community members started in 2020, with the original concept released last year in 2022, and a revised version released this month. Community feedback was acquired through various platforms including public information sessions, an open email for feedback, and public surveys. A summary report of that feedback was published on October 6th, which highlighted the six most common themes of community residents’ concerns. The first concern was related to the size and number of the multiple high-rise apartments which were designed to exceed 30 floors. In the new plan , they have removed one of the three planned buildings, with fewer total units in each, and only one tower with the potential to be built at 40 stories. Residents were also concerned about the loss of greenspace due to the new event center construction. Many people suggested they wanted that greenspace allocated elsewhere, or alternatively, an accessible greenspace roof on the event center. Although in the original plan the city had conceptualized a greenspace rooftop on the event center, this was scrapped in the new plan as it was deemed too expensive to maintain. Respondents wanted a restriction of vehicles to the premises to promote pedestrian safety, a concern that has existed since Lansdowne was first renovated back in 2014. They also wanted more public transportation infrastructure to and from the park, whether that is the local city buses, trains, or cycling infrastructure to reduce congestion on connecting roads. Relatedly, residents also desired more accessible public use space from washrooms to water fountains to usable and free space for people to occupy. The new plan has reduced the number of parking spaces for the residential buildings to meet the Bylaw limit of 0.4 spaces per unit, down from 739 to 336 spaces, while they added 36 new spaces for the event center. In terms of accessible public space, the new plan includes 27,000 square feet of space originally earmarked for the third residential building, now available for an unspecified “public realm.” Residents also wanted more local and less corporate or big-box businesses, to reflect the unique local community better. The new plan does suggest the amount of retail space has been reduced from 108,000 square feet to 49,000 square feet but does not directly address the desire to attract smaller, local businesses. Finally, there was also a concern about financial transparency of how the project is being funded and the resulting impact on the City. The Federation of Citizens Association (FCA) which represents over 70 community groups voted unanimously to oppose the new plan, which comes with a very costly price tag of $419 million, increased from $332 million of the first plan. They cite that the debt comes at a time when the transit system is facing major issues, and the city is struggling with a housing affordability crisis.
20 Dec, 2023
Context Newly elected Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith has defended her cabinet which is coming under fire over conflict-of-interest concerns. Environment and Protected Areas Minister Rebecca Schulz’s husband, Cole Schulz , may be lobbying the government in the areas that the Minister works in. Cole Schulz's firm is working on removing the protection of a threatened caribou range to make room for the oil and gas industry – which has raised concerns over who has Minister Schulz’s ear. Analysis The company that Cole Schulz is a partner with, Garrison Strategies, was hired by the Explorers and Producers Association of Canada and is working to influence the government on the issuing of reclamation certificates for oil and gas sites. The lobbyists are working to gain more access to protected caribou habitats to expand the oil and gas industry. They are hoping to “ address the moratorium on tenure in caribou regions ” which would effectively give them better access to land and investments. The Little Smoky and A La Peche herds in northwest Alberta were protected by a moratorium in 2013 which stopped the granting of new energy leases in this area. At the time, 95 percent of the herd’s range was heavily damaged. Phillip Meintzer of the Alberta Wilderness Association found that though records show that Garrison didn’t contact Environment and Protected Areas directly, the firm’s causes are “ too close for comfort ”. Meintzer also notes that as Garrison works on opening the protected caribou land for Alberta Energy, Environment and Protected Areas should be working on a protection plan for the federally and provincially designated threatened animal . Minister Schulz is working closely with the ethics commissioner, however, Danielle Smith confirmed that “ the ethics commissioner has looked at it, given guidance and there’s no violation [of the Conflicts of Interest Act]”. Cole Schulz also indicated that his firm wasn’t aware that Minister Schulz breached the Act at any time. Meintzer suggests that this situation “ calls for a further look ” from a third party. Sources https://globalnews.ca/news/9988998/alberta-premier-danielle-smith-rebecca-schulz/
Share by: