Blog Layout

May 17, 2023

Short-Term Vacation Rentals

How Platforms Like Airbnb Impact Hosts, Guests, and Cities

As pandemic restrictions ease and travelers flock to new cities around the world, short-term vacation rental platforms such as Airbnb provide an attractive alternative to traditional hotels.



Offering a unique opportunity to live like a local, Airbnbs and other short-term rental sites have rapidly grown in popularity over the past decade. And while they still don’t match up to hotels in terms of market size, there’s no doubt that they’ve reshaped the way that people travel. 


So, how have short-term vacation rentals affected the hosts who rent out their properties, the guests who stay in these accommodations, and the cities who have seen an explosion of new listings in their communities? And do the benefits outweigh the costs?


This article, part of a series on the rise of the gig economy, will explore the pros and cons of short-term rentals. 


An Overview of the Short-Term Vacation Rental Industry

Short-term vacation rental platforms allow property owners to rent out space to travelers. Originally billed as a way to make additional income off of a spare room or to offset the cost of a mortgage while a unit was vacant, entrepreneurs and investors quickly realized that they could professionalize the industry and build significant businesses. 


VRBO (Vacation Rentals By Owner) launched as one of the first vacation rental platforms in 1995. But the industry hit the mainstream with the arrival of Airbnb in 2008. Since then, the global vacation rental industry has grown to more than US $82 billion in 2022, with more than 887 million users expected to book a short-term rental by 2026.


These numbers are still relatively small compared to the traditional hotel and resort sector. Worldwide revenue peaked before the pandemic at $1.52 trillion in 2019, before dropping back to around $1 trillion in 2022 as the industry recovered from the pandemic.


Advantages of Short-Term Vacation Rentals 

Hosts Can Build a Viable Business

When it first started, Airbnb was aimed at allowing people to rent out a spare room to make additional income. And this is still a viable option for many users on the platform. In fact, a 2021 survey found that 54 percent of those who own their home would consider renting it out and that a further 82 percent believe this is a good money-making strategy. 


In terms of average earnings, Airbnb far exceeds other gig economy platforms such as Taskrabbit, Uber, and Fiverr. A 2021 report showed that nearly half of all Airbnb hosts make more than $500 per month, while the top 10 percent earn at least $2000 per month. Overall, the average host earned $924 per month, more than triple that of Taskrabbit users which ranked second on the list. 


Another advantage of Airbnb is that it can grow into a larger business. Unlike Uber, where earnings are limited by the driver’s time and ability to provide rides, Airbnb hosts can have multiple listings earning money simultaneously. There are nearly 2 million professionally managed vacation rental properties in the US alone, and more than 60,000 Airbnb hosts operate at least two other listings. For those who can, Airbnb represents a real opportunity to make money, especially in tourist destinations.


Guests Gain Unique Experiences Compared to Hotels

Unlike hotels, short-term rentals typically offer guests a unique travel experience in different parts of a city. They allow guests to live more like a local, seeing the city more authentically than if they stayed at a hotel. 


In general, guests have tended to prefer Airbnbs to hotels. A recent Goldman Sachs survey found that 79 percent of respondents preferred hotels until they stayed in a vacation rental, at which point the number dropped to only 40 percent. A second survey also found that 60 percent of travelers who had used both preferred Airbnbs.


Among the top reasons for choosing a vacation rental over a hotel included access to a kitchen, increased privacy, and the larger space offered by rentals. Interestingly, leisure travelers tended to prefer Airbnbs, while business travelers preferred hotels. Nearly 70 percent of business travelers reported a negative experience with the platform. 


Cities Can Benefit From Tourism and Taxes

Airbnb and other short-term rental platforms can bring tourists to cities and provide an economic benefit to surrounding communities. According to one 2017 study, Airbnb was found to support more than 730,000 jobs and deliver more than $61 billion in global output. Beyond these economic benefits, Airbnb claimed to have collected and remitted more than $1.5 billion in tourism taxes in the US in 2021, an increase of 87 percent over 2019.


However, there is some evidence to suggest these claims may be misleading. For example, two studies have found that only 2 to 4 percent of Airbnb guests would not have taken their trip if Airbnb wasn’t available, indicating that travelers are simply substituting hotel stays rather than traveling more.


Likewise, hotels are typically the largest source of tourism tax dollars for cities, and in places that lack strong regulations, cities are likely to lose out on a significant share of this important source of revenue. 


Disadvantages of Short-Term Vacation Rentals

Inconsistent Accommodations

While Airbnbs offer unique experiences and a wider choice of accommodations, the flip side of this point is that guests can have vastly different experiences from one stay to the next. The platforms themselves take a light-touch approach to managing the accommodation, leaving the hosts responsible for everything. As a result, there is no guarantee of the level of service, quality, security, and cleanliness once a guest arrives.


On the inconvenient end of the scale, this could mean a difficult check-in experience or a host being late to drop off a key. In other cases, guests have found units that have not been properly cleaned or repaired between visits.


The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic offered a unique glimpse into how this could impact guests. Most hotels offered generous refunds to travelers who had to cancel their trips due to the pandemic, while sites like VRBO left it up to the hosts to decide. Airbnb eventually set up a large fund to help cover the cost of refunds for hosts, but guests still had to go through the host to receive a refund. 


But the lack of standards can have more dangerous consequences as well. There are many horror stories of violence, break-ins, and other security concerns. In one case, Airbnb paid $7 million to a guest after she was assaulted by someone with a duplicate key to the unit. 


Short-Term Rentals Raise Housing Costs

One of the biggest issues surrounding short-term vacation rentals is that they take housing off the market and repurpose it for tourists who don’t live in the city. With less supply, housing prices increase, eventually pricing people out of the market and forcing them to move to other communities. 

While all cities face this challenge, the problem is greatest in cities with large tourism industries such as New York, Barcelona, and Toronto. A 2019 report showed that 6,500 homes were removed from the market in Toronto, and McGill University found that more than 31,000 rental units across Canada were no longer available as housing. 


Multiple studies have found a causal link between an increase in short-term rental units and an increase in rental and ownership costs. A 2021 paper from researchers at the University of Cologne in Germany attributed 14.2 percent of overall rent increases to short-term rentals, equivalent to about US $385 per year for new tenants. 


A separate study reported in Harvard Business Review found that, when taken in aggregate, the growth of Airbnb alone was causally associated with about 20 percent of the average annual increase in US rents and about 14 percent of the annual increase in housing prices. 


Short-Term Vacation Rentals May Be Illegal or Increasingly Regulated

Citing the impact on housing costs as well as the local communities they operate in, many cities have taken steps to regulate, tax, or outright ban the short-term rental industry.

Barcelona, a long-time tourist destination, became the first European city to ban short-term private-room rentals in August 2021. Other European cities including Berlin, Prague, Madrid, and Amsterdam have all passed regulations of their own in the forms of quotas, licenses, zoning, or taxes to limit the spread of short-term rentals. 


As cities grapple with how to regulate these so-called “ghost hotels”, they are also struggling to enforce existing regulations. Because of the additional burden placed on city staff, many illegal listings remain available on platforms such as Airbnb. In New York, for example, 45 percent of all Airbnb reservations were illegal, accounting for more than two-thirds of all revenue earned in the city.


Short-Term Rentals Offer an Alternative to Traditional Hotels, But With Some Costs

Short-term rentals provide travelers with more choice of where to stay, a unique accommodation over a hotel, and an opportunity to experience a city like a local. But while they may claim to bring economic benefits to a city, the existing evidence suggests these benefits are outweighed by the costs incurred by cities in the form of increased housing costs and a loss of tourism tax revenues.


As the tourism industry rebounds from the pandemic, short-term vacation rentals will continue to be an attractive choice for travelers. In response, cities will need to continue to find ways to allow these services to operate while mitigating the downsides for local residents. When traveling, guests should look to choose an accommodation that fits their budget, needs, and location, while taking steps to ensure they are following all regulations and being good neighbors to those who live in the community.

December 23, 2023
Context A CBC News article discussed the possibility of the Canadian economy heading into a recession, or whether the country has already passed that threshold. The article discussed this possibility based on slowed growth, high inflation, and the Bank of Canada’s continued interest rate hikes. Analysis A recession is a significant reduction in economic activity that occurs over a length of time, usually months or years. One of the most accepted definitions of a recession comes from the economist Julius Shiskin in 1974, who identified the threshold to an economic recession as two consecutive quarters of declining GDP, although economists often argue about the comprehensiveness of this measure. The causes of a recession can be quite complicated and have many contributing factors. Some common examples include a sudden economic shock such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic, excessive debt, asset bubbles, inflation, deflation, or large technological changes. One major factor influencing the probability of an economic recession includes rising interest rates from the Bank of Canada, which has implemented the highest hike in the shortest amount of time in all of the bank’s history, raising the rate over eight times since 2022. The Bank of Canada increased interest rates in order to curb inflation since rising interest rates discourage taking on debt and spending. This further encourages companies to lower prices or slow inflation to increase demand. Currently, the Bank of Canada is keeping at the 5.0 percent rate but has said that further hikes are not off the table as inflation may continue to exceed acceptable rates. Increases in interest rates can certainly contribute to or precede a recession. In fact, the Bank of Canada has raised interest rates three times to slow inflation since the 1960s and all three times this action led to an economic recession. Current fears of a looming economic depression are also not unique to Canada, as following the COVID-19 pandemic, the global inflation rate increased to 8.73 percent in 2021. This was due to supply chain issues, as well as the effect of the Russia-Ukraine War creating rising food and energy prices, as well as general fiscal instability. A majority of the World Economic Forum’s lead economists agreed earlier this year that we could see the beginning of a global recession starting in 2023, which would certainly affect the Canadian economy. The article also discusses the Canadian economy’s slowed economic growth, as the GDP has stagnated in the second quarter of this year. However, it suggests other factors may explain the decrease, including striking port workers in British Columbia, and the resulting negative effect on economic activity. An RBC report mentions how on a per-person GDP basis, there has already been a decline for four straight quarters despite a surge in population growth, and concludes overall predictions for GDP growth do not look promising despite local factors including Canadian wildfires and strikes. They also point to a 0.5 percent increase in the unemployment rate over the past few months, which has historically tended to indicate a looming recession.
December 21, 2023
Context The City of Ottawa Mayor, Mark Sutcliff released a statement about a revised plan for the redevelopment of Lansdowne, an urban public park containing historic landmarks and commercial venues. The project includes the demolition of a sports arena complex, stadium stands, and the building of a new event center, residential units, and retail space. Despite suggesting the new plan has addressed the concerns of residents, many issues remain. Analysis The City of Ottawa and the Ottawa Sports and Entertainment Group (OSEG) have been in partnership to develop Lansdowne since 2012 and finished an original redevelopment of the park back in 2014. A few years later in 2019, the financial sustainability of the park came to the city council’s attention, and in 2020 the partnership was extended another 10 years with direction to develop a new plan to revitalize Lansdowne. Consultation with community members started in 2020, with the original concept released last year in 2022, and a revised version released this month. Community feedback was acquired through various platforms including public information sessions, an open email for feedback, and public surveys. A summary report of that feedback was published on October 6th, which highlighted the six most common themes of community residents’ concerns. The first concern was related to the size and number of the multiple high-rise apartments which were designed to exceed 30 floors. In the new plan , they have removed one of the three planned buildings, with fewer total units in each, and only one tower with the potential to be built at 40 stories. Residents were also concerned about the loss of greenspace due to the new event center construction. Many people suggested they wanted that greenspace allocated elsewhere, or alternatively, an accessible greenspace roof on the event center. Although in the original plan the city had conceptualized a greenspace rooftop on the event center, this was scrapped in the new plan as it was deemed too expensive to maintain. Respondents wanted a restriction of vehicles to the premises to promote pedestrian safety, a concern that has existed since Lansdowne was first renovated back in 2014. They also wanted more public transportation infrastructure to and from the park, whether that is the local city buses, trains, or cycling infrastructure to reduce congestion on connecting roads. Relatedly, residents also desired more accessible public use space from washrooms to water fountains to usable and free space for people to occupy. The new plan has reduced the number of parking spaces for the residential buildings to meet the Bylaw limit of 0.4 spaces per unit, down from 739 to 336 spaces, while they added 36 new spaces for the event center. In terms of accessible public space, the new plan includes 27,000 square feet of space originally earmarked for the third residential building, now available for an unspecified “public realm.” Residents also wanted more local and less corporate or big-box businesses, to reflect the unique local community better. The new plan does suggest the amount of retail space has been reduced from 108,000 square feet to 49,000 square feet but does not directly address the desire to attract smaller, local businesses. Finally, there was also a concern about financial transparency of how the project is being funded and the resulting impact on the City. The Federation of Citizens Association (FCA) which represents over 70 community groups voted unanimously to oppose the new plan, which comes with a very costly price tag of $419 million, increased from $332 million of the first plan. They cite that the debt comes at a time when the transit system is facing major issues, and the city is struggling with a housing affordability crisis.
December 20, 2023
Context Newly elected Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith has defended her cabinet which is coming under fire over conflict-of-interest concerns. Environment and Protected Areas Minister Rebecca Schulz’s husband, Cole Schulz , may be lobbying the government in the areas that the Minister works in. Cole Schulz's firm is working on removing the protection of a threatened caribou range to make room for the oil and gas industry – which has raised concerns over who has Minister Schulz’s ear. Analysis The company that Cole Schulz is a partner with, Garrison Strategies, was hired by the Explorers and Producers Association of Canada and is working to influence the government on the issuing of reclamation certificates for oil and gas sites. The lobbyists are working to gain more access to protected caribou habitats to expand the oil and gas industry. They are hoping to “ address the moratorium on tenure in caribou regions ” which would effectively give them better access to land and investments. The Little Smoky and A La Peche herds in northwest Alberta were protected by a moratorium in 2013 which stopped the granting of new energy leases in this area. At the time, 95 percent of the herd’s range was heavily damaged. Phillip Meintzer of the Alberta Wilderness Association found that though records show that Garrison didn’t contact Environment and Protected Areas directly, the firm’s causes are “ too close for comfort ”. Meintzer also notes that as Garrison works on opening the protected caribou land for Alberta Energy, Environment and Protected Areas should be working on a protection plan for the federally and provincially designated threatened animal . Minister Schulz is working closely with the ethics commissioner, however, Danielle Smith confirmed that “ the ethics commissioner has looked at it, given guidance and there’s no violation [of the Conflicts of Interest Act]”. Cole Schulz also indicated that his firm wasn’t aware that Minister Schulz breached the Act at any time. Meintzer suggests that this situation “ calls for a further look ” from a third party. Sources https://globalnews.ca/news/9988998/alberta-premier-danielle-smith-rebecca-schulz/
Share by: